ECPR Konferansı
TÜBİTAK /SOBAG 1001 Projesi / Proje No. 112K172
Türkiye'de Dış Politika Krizlerinde Karar Verme ve Kriz Yönetimi Süreç Analizi
  • Üyelik

ECPR Glasgow 2014 General Conference

ecpr11ecpr216logo

 Proje Grubumuz 3-6 Eylül 2014 tarihlerinde  European Consortium for Political Research-ECPR tarafından İskoçya-Glasgow'da düzenlenen General Conference 2014'e katılarak proje çıktılarını tartışacak.

 Ayrıntılar için bkz.;

 

Analysing Foreign Policy Crises: Conceptual, Theoretical and Practical Discussions

 

http://ecpr.eu/Events/PanelDetails.aspx?PanelID=3444&EventID=14

 

Analysing Foreign Policy Crises: Conceptual, Theoretical and Practical Discussions

 

Panel Chair
Bu e-Posta adresi istenmeyen posta engelleyicileri tarafından korunuyor. Görüntülemek için JavaScript etkinleştirilmelidir.
Yildiz Technical University

 

Panel Co-Chair
Bu e-Posta adresi istenmeyen posta engelleyicileri tarafından korunuyor. Görüntülemek için JavaScript etkinleştirilmelidir.
Yildiz Technical University

 

Panel Discussant
Bu e-Posta adresi istenmeyen posta engelleyicileri tarafından korunuyor. Görüntülemek için JavaScript etkinleştirilmelidir.
Yildiz Technical University

 

Conference
ECPR General Conference 2014, Glasgow

 

 

Panel Number
P418

 

Keywords
 

 

Abstract
 
 
 

 

 

The world crisis, which comes from antic Greek, is being used in various areas including the foreign policy. Even in foreign policy, one might find a wide variety of definitions on what a crisis is. Charles Hermann accepts the existence of a crisis, if, and only if, it threatens one or more important goals of a state; allows only a short time for decision before the situation is significantly transformed and occurs as a surprise to the policy makers (Hermann 1972, 187). As Hermann notes, not all incidents, defined as foreign policy crises, actually conform to this definition. The multifariousness -or the confusion- in defining a crisis is also being observed in states’ ways of dealing with their foreign policy crises. Scholars such as Brecher and Wilkenfeld (2003), Lehman (2011), George (1991) and Williams (1976) all deal with the question of classifying the crises and the states’ crisis management styles. In this context, this panel aims to reflect the findings of a project, supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), on the analysis of decision-making and crisis management processes in Turkish foreign policy. The papers brought together under this panel are formulated to make various conceptual, theoretical and practical discussions regarding crisis and crisis management as well as decision making in foreign policy. In this respect, the first paper aims to express the benefits of Neo-Classical realism in understanding the roots and routes of the foreign policy crises, while the second paper reflects a detailed model template, developed by the project group, to analyze the foreign policy crises in a much simple way. The rest of the papers, however, act on a practical ground to examine Turkey’s way of dealing with foreign policy crises through detailed case studies of Cyprus, Mavi Marmara and Syria crises.

 

 

Paper List

Title
 
 
A Long-lasting Foreign Policy Crisis: Turkey's Military Intervention to Cyprus in its 40th Anniversary View Paper Details
Formulating a Model Template to Analyze Foreign Policy Crises View Paper Details
Neo-Classical Realism in Analyzing the Crisis Management View Paper Details
The Role of Emotions and Worldviews in Turkish Crisis Management: The Case of Syria View Paper Details
Understanding the Mavi Marmara Crisis in Turkish-Israeli Relations View Paper Details

 

Okunma 23942 defa

S5 Box

ÜYE GİRİŞ

Sitemize Hoş Geldiniz

Yine Bekleriz, Dileriz Yararlı Olmuştur...